What does a positive coronavirus test really mean?

One thing is for sure that the test does not show the presence of the virus. Anyone who says otherwise is misinformed or lying. At present, there is no test available to test the coronavirus.

The test, which is usually conducted using swab samples, is called the PCR test. The PCR test does not test the virus, but a long chain chemical compound commonly known by its fancy name DNA or RNA. Therefore, the test is a chemical test to monitor a chemical compound (DNA or RNA) or its part by its nature. With a positive test result, it is assumed that the RNA is from the coronavirus. However, because no one has seen or isolated actual coronavirus, it is impossible to establish if the RNA (or its part) is from the virus. The positive test results could be from any or many sources, including regular seasonal, live or dead, flu-virus, or its debris.

Also, scientifically speaking, before any test is accepted for its intended use, it must be validated to show that it is specific and accurate. However, the current PCR test could not be validated because it would require coronavirus itself and its RNA that is not available. Therefore, the PCR test becomes invalid or irrelevant and unpredictable.

So to the question, “What does a positive coronavirus test really mean?” The answer is NOTHING! For a more detailed discussion on the topic, please follow the link..

(Revised for editorial changes on November 23, 2020).

CDC virus testing and isolation claims for SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19: Non-scientific and pure illusion!

A few days ago I provided critical comments on a publication from Australia (University of Melbourne) which claimed isolation and identification of SARS-CoV-2 virus [1]. I suggested that claims were not supported by scientific evidence and logic.

The present article critically evaluates a similar claim from America’s Center for Disease Control (CDC) in a publication [2] entitled: Continue here

Isolation and characterization of the virus (SARS-CoV-2)

It is both logical and common sense to expect that if a particular material is claimed to exist then its presence must be established using valid and well-recognised practices and laws of science. For example, if it is suggested that a certain geographical area may provide a significant amount of mineral such as gold or oil then that mineral must be extracted, isolated and characterized before proceeding with large scale production for public benefit and commercial gains. The same understanding has to be applied in other areas including the medical and pharmaceutical areas.

At present the world is allegedly in the grip of a serious and wide-spread disease (pandemic) referred to as COVID-19 caused by a virus labelled as SARS-CoV-2. Hence, there is purportedly an urgent need for a treatment for this disease. Commensurately, it is important to note that the medical community has declared with apparent certainty that disease (COVID-19) exists and is caused by the virus SARS-CoV-2. [click here to continue]

Edited and revised for clarity and grammatical improvements on November 5th, 2020.

Science at the authorities – tests which do not test!

If scientists and health care professionals, including physicians and pharmacists, at the regulatory authorities had paid attention to false testing practices and requirements for pharmaceuticals, current pandemic would never have happened. Basis of virus and pandemic is “testing” developed and implemented by experts with no or limited expertise in the area of testing resulted in false conclusions and declaration of the virus just like persistence false claims about the quality (by extension safety and efficacy) of the approved and marketed pharmaceuticals (1, 2).

It is impossible to get out this situation until analytical science (testing) and its principles are allowed to be followed. Fearmongering and censorship have always been tried like at present to protect the status quo and the “experts” however they always fail – so will be this time as well.

Consider conducting testing based on relevant and true scientific principles.

COVID-19: “Pandemic” is ending – a need for better and relevant science and scientists for the future

Observing the discussions on the LinkedIn forums, it appears that there is much less activity and debate about the relevancy and credibility of the tests/testing. One can safely assume that it is generally being recognised and accepted now that testing or tests have been scientifically irrelevant, hence grossly misrepresented the presence of virus and/or spread of its associated infection/disease.

Certainly, there are reported “cases”, which really mean not much as they are reflection of PCR and/or antibodies tests. The “cases” are promoted as to represent virus and/or COVID-19 which scientifically speaking is a lie. The tests represent non-specific fragments of RNA/DNA or proteins not the virus or infection. In scientific terminology, tests have never been validated for the virus or infection. The reason this misrepresentation occurred is because the subject of testing (developing and validating tests) was dealt by people and disciplines unrelated to the area of testing resulting in disastrous damage to the societies and notoriety to the science. To protect from further damage the testing for the “cases” should immediately be stopped.

There is an urgent need for assigning appropriate experts and expertise for monitoring the virus and infections to avoid the spread of current and future false pandemics along with the associated hysteria and fearmongering.

Donate

Your support is needed in providing free and unbiased scientific work. Please donate (any amount). Thanks


Archives
Links

PharmacoMechanics